Burke v. Kingsport Publishing Corporation

E.D. Tennessee

Burke v. Kingsport Publishing Corporation

377 F. Supp. 221, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12380

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee

DecidedFebruary 6, 1974

DocketCIV-2-74-6

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 377 F. Supp. 221 (Burke v. Kingsport Publishing Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. Kingsport Publishing Corporation, 377 F. Supp. 221, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12380 (E.D. Tenn. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

In a document entitled “motion for declaratory judgement [sic: judgment].” the plaintiff Mr. Herman Burke seeks punitive damages from the defendant Kingsport Publishing Corporation for refusing on or after November 20, 1973 to publish in its newspaper a want-ad to be headed: “WANTED — JUSTICE IN SCOTT COUNTY.” The plaintiff asserts he was incarcerated in Virginia at the time, and the defendant publishes its newspaper in Tennessee.

The jurisdiction of this Court is sought to be invoked under 28 U.S.C. § *222 1443; however, that statute relates to the removal of civil rights actions. This Court defers for the moment the issue of whether its jurisdiction has been invoked.

The defendant moved, inter alia, for a dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff failed to state á claim on which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There is merit to such motion. In the absence of circumstances amounting to an illegal monopoly or conspiracy, the publisher of a newspaper is not required to publish an advertisement, even where the advertisement is a proper one, and the regular fee for publication has been paid or tendered. Anno: Advertisement —Publisher’s Refusal, 18 A.L.R. (3d) 1287, citing In Re Louis Wohl, Inc., D.C.Mich. (1931), 50 F.2d 254; Approved Personnel, Inc. v. Tribune Co., C.A.Fla. (1965), 177 So.2d 704, 18 A.L.R.3d 1277, 1281-1284 [1]; Shuck v. Carroll Daily Herald (1933), 215 Iowa 1276, 247 N.W. 813, 87 A.L.R. 975, 978-979; Friedenberg v. Times Pub. Co. (1930), 170 La. 3, 127 So. 345; North Station Wine Co. v. United Liquors (1948), 323 Mass. 48, 80 N.E.2d 1; J. J. Gordon, Inc. v. Worcester Tel. Publishing Co. (1961), 343 Mass. 142, 177 N.E.2d 586; Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc., C.A.Mich. (1966) , 5 Mich.App. 74, 145 N.W.2d 800; Chronicle & Gazette Publishing Co. v. Atty. Gen. (1946), 94 N.H. 148, 48 A.2d 478, 168 A.L.R. 879, 883-884 (headnote 14), (dictum, appeal dismissed (1947), 329 U.S. 690, 67 S.Ct. 495, 91 L.Ed. 604, rehearing denied (1947), 329 U.S. 835, 67 S.Ct. 632, 91 L.Ed. 707; Camp-of-the-Pines, Inc. v. New York Times Co. (1945), 184 Misc. 389, 53 N.Y.S.2d 475; Poughkeepsie Buying Service v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers (1954), 205 Misc. 982, 131 N.Y.S.2d 515; contra: Uhlman v. Sherman (1919), 31 Ohio Dec. 54, 22 Ohio NP (NS) 225, which was afterward declared by another Ohio court to be a wrong decision, Sky High Theatre, Inc. v. Gaurner Publishing Co. (unreported), no. 22820.

Accordingly, even if this Court’s jurisdiction were properly invoked, the plaintiff has not stated a claim on which relief can be granted, and this action hereby is

Dismissed. Should the plaintiff give timely notice of an appeal, he is authorized to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Rule 24(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

In a document entitled “motion for declaratory judgement [sic: judgment].” the plaintiff Mr. Herman Burke seeks punitive damages from the defendant Kingsport Publishing Corporation for refusing on or after November 20, 1973 to publish in its newspaper a want-ad to be headed: “WANTED — JUSTICE IN SCOTT COUNTY.” The plaintiff asserts he was incarcerated in Virginia at the time, and the defendant publishes its newspaper in Tennessee.

The jurisdiction of this Court is sought to be invoked under 28 U.S.C. § *222 1443; however, that statute relates to the removal of civil rights actions. This Court defers for the moment the issue of whether its jurisdiction has been invoked.

The defendant moved, inter alia, for a dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff failed to state á claim on which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There is merit to such motion. In the absence of circumstances amounting to an illegal monopoly or conspiracy, the publisher of a newspaper is not required to publish an advertisement, even where the advertisement is a proper one, and the regular fee for publication has been paid or tendered. Anno: Advertisement —Publisher’s Refusal, 18 A.L.R. (3d) 1287, citing In Re Louis Wohl, Inc., D.C.Mich. (1931), 50 F.2d 254; Approved Personnel, Inc. v. Tribune Co., C.A.Fla. (1965), 177 So.2d 704, 18 A.L.R.3d 1277, 1281-1284 [1]; Shuck v. Carroll Daily Herald (1933), 215 Iowa 1276, 247 N.W. 813, 87 A.L.R. 975, 978-979; Friedenberg v. Times Pub. Co. (1930), 170 La. 3, 127 So. 345; North Station Wine Co. v. United Liquors (1948), 323 Mass. 48, 80 N.E.2d 1; J. J. Gordon, Inc. v. Worcester Tel. Publishing Co. (1961), 343 Mass. 142, 177 N.E.2d 586; Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc., C.A.Mich. (1966) , 5 Mich.App. 74, 145 N.W.2d 800; Chronicle & Gazette Publishing Co. v. Atty. Gen. (1946), 94 N.H. 148, 48 A.2d 478, 168 A.L.R. 879, 883-884 (headnote 14), (dictum, appeal dismissed (1947), 329 U.S. 690, 67 S.Ct. 495, 91 L.Ed. 604, rehearing denied (1947), 329 U.S. 835, 67 S.Ct. 632, 91 L.Ed. 707; Camp-of-the-Pines, Inc. v. New York Times Co. (1945), 184 Misc. 389, 53 N.Y.S.2d 475; Poughkeepsie Buying Service v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers (1954), 205 Misc. 982, 131 N.Y.S.2d 515; contra: Uhlman v. Sherman (1919), 31 Ohio Dec. 54, 22 Ohio NP (NS) 225, which was afterward declared by another Ohio court to be a wrong decision, Sky High Theatre, Inc. v. Gaurner Publishing Co. (unreported), no. 22820.

Accordingly, even if this Court’s jurisdiction were properly invoked, the plaintiff has not stated a claim on which relief can be granted, and this action hereby is

Dismissed. Should the plaintiff give timely notice of an appeal, he is authorized to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Rule 24(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

377 F. Supp. 221, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-kingsport-publishing-corporation-tned-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack