Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters

51 So. 2d 827, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 649
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 5, 1951·No. No. 7643·Published

Opinion

KENNON, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, La.App., 51 So.2d 819, the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Mamie S. Burke, and against the defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read as follows:

Minden Sanitarium bill $ 133.00
Dr. C. M. Baker 131.00
Ambulance 7.50
Pain and suffering of her
husband, David Burke 1,500.00
Loss of husband’s support
and companionship 4,500.00
$6,272.35

The judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Mamie S. Burke, and against the defendant, Highway Insurance Underwriters, is amended to read $2,984.55.

In all other respects the judgments in favor of this plaintiff are to remain as written. As amended, the entire judgment is affirmed, with costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, 51 So. 2d 827, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 649 (La. Ct. App. 1951).

51 So. 2d 827 (Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters
51 So. 2d 819 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1951)