Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters
This text of 51 So. 2d 827 (Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons assigned in Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, La.App., 51 So.2d 819, the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Mamie S. Burke, and against the defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read as follows:
Minden Sanitarium bill $ 133.00
Dr. C. M. Baker 131.00
Ambulance 7.50
Pain and suffering of her
husband, David Burke 1,500.00
Loss of husband’s support
and companionship 4,500.00
$6,272.35
The judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Mamie S. Burke, and against the defendant, Highway Insurance Underwriters, is amended to read $2,984.55.
In all other respects the judgments in favor of this plaintiff are to remain as written. As amended, the entire judgment is affirmed, with costs of both courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 So. 2d 827, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-highway-ins-underwriters-lactapp-1951.