Burke v. H. Clausen & Sons Brewing Co.

126 F. 1022, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4381
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 8, 1903
DocketNo. 90
StatusPublished

This text of 126 F. 1022 (Burke v. H. Clausen & Sons Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burke v. H. Clausen & Sons Brewing Co., 126 F. 1022, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4381 (2d Cir. 1903).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are convinced that the labels and capsule, in the collocation in which they appear on the appellant’s bottles, constitute an infringement of the appellees’ capsule and labels. In view of the comprehensive character of the injunction order, we deem it prudent to add that we do not wish to be considered as holding that the appellant’s labels per se infringe. If these labels were used separately, or collocated in dissimilar environments, a different question would arise, regarding which, at this time, we express no opinion. The order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 F. 1022, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-h-clausen-sons-brewing-co-ca2-1903.