Burke v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burke v. Florida Parole Commission

876 So. 2d 698, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9013, 2004 WL 1439952

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2004·No. No. 1D03-4685·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 6, 2004, the Court has determined that the appellant’s motion for rehearing of the trial court’s order entered on August 8, 2003, was not timely served, see Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b), and did not delay rendition of the final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Therefore, the notice of appeal filed October 27, 2003 is untimely and the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 6, 2004, the Court has determined that the appellant’s motion for rehearing of the trial court’s order entered on August 8, 2003, was not timely served, see Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b), and did not delay rendition of the final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Therefore, the notice of appeal filed October 27, 2003 is untimely and the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Burke v. Florida Parole Commission, 876 So. 2d 698, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9013, 2004 WL 1439952 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

876 So. 2d 698 (Burke v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.