Burke v. Excalibur Exploration, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Burke v. Excalibur Exploration, Inc.

2017 Ohio 7567, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1427

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 13, 2017

Docket2017-0600

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 7567 (Burke v. Excalibur Exploration, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. Excalibur Exploration, Inc., 2017 Ohio 7567, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1427 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Ashtabula App. No. 2016-A-0041, 2017-Ohio-999. On intervening appellant’s motion to vacate lower courts’ judgments. Motion granted. The judgments are vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court to determine the necessary parties to this action. On motion to intervene as necessary parties and motion to dismiss by EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-A, L.P., CGAS Properties, L.P., and EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-WI, L.P. Motions denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashtabula App. No. 2016-A-0041, 2017-Ohio-999. On intervening appellant’s motion to vacate lower courts’ judgments. Motion granted. The judgments are vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court to determine the necessary parties to this action. On motion to intervene as necessary parties and motion to dismiss by EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-A, L.P., CGAS Properties, L.P., and EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-WI, L.P. Motions denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 7567, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-excalibur-exploration-inc-ohio-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack