Burke v. Duke

208 P. 77, 120 Wash. 695, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 979
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 7, 1922
DocketNo. 17289
StatusPublished

This text of 208 P. 77 (Burke v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burke v. Duke, 208 P. 77, 120 Wash. 695, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 979 (Wash. 1922).

Opinion

Mackintosh, J.

—This is a companion case to the cases of Duke v. Force, ante p. 599, 208 Pac. 67, and Duke v. Burke, ante p. 694, 208 Pac. 77. Burke, who was a stockholder in the Scandinavian-American Bank of Seattle, seeks to establish his claim for $7,000 against the insolvent bank, that being the amount he paid under an assessment of the board of directors, pursuant to directions of the-bank examiner, made in 1920, and presents the question whether the one-hundred per cent assessment made by the board of directors in 1920 was legal, and if illegal whether the payment can be recovered. We have decided in the Force case, supra, that the assessment was illegal, but that the stockholder is estopped by his delay and the result of his conduct from now being entitled to share with the other creditors to the extent of the illegal payment exacted from him.

On the authority of the Force case, supra, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Pabkeb, C. J., Bbidges, Main, Holcomb, Tolman, Mitchell, and Hovey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duke v. Force
208 P. 67 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)
Duke v. Burke
208 P. 77 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 P. 77, 120 Wash. 695, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-duke-wash-1922.