Burke v. Dillingham
60 F. 729, 9 C.C.A. 255, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2135
This text of 60 F. 729 (Burke v. Dillingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burke v. Dillingham, 60 F. 729, 9 C.C.A. 255, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2135 (5th Cir. 1894).
Opinion
On the authority of Turner v. Cross, 83 Tex. 218, 18 S. W. 578, we must hold that, for the injury which resulted in the death of Thomas W. Burke, the statute of Texas did not authorize a recovery of damages against the defendant in error. The demurrer to the petition was properly sustained, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Turner v. Cross and Eddy, Receivers
60 F. 179 (Texas Supreme Court, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 F. 729, 9 C.C.A. 255, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-dillingham-ca5-1894.