Burke v. Dade County
390 So. 2d 797, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18161
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury regarding a statute not brought into issue by the evidence: Testimony established that the vehicle in question was stopped for traffic, rather than for the pedestrian (plaintiff). But see § 316.-130, Fla.Stat. (1977).
We similarly affirm the court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict. See Stresscon International, Inc. v. Helms, 390 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burke v. Dade County, 390 So. 2d 797, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
390 So. 2d 797 (Burke v. Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STRESSCON INTERN., INC. v. Helms
390 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)