Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria

214 A.D.2d 414, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 414 (Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria, 214 A.D.2d 414, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about October 8, 1993, which denied defendant’s motion to reject the report of the Special Referee who found that the partnership agreement did not empower defendant to deprive plaintiff of his share of profits derived from his former law firm and directed an accounting, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[415]*415Giving a " 'fair and reasonable interpretation’ ” to the partnership agreement (Farrell Lines v City of New York, 30 NY2d 76, 83), the Referee properly found that the remaining partners improperly claimed equitable considerations to deny plaintiff any distribution for the months prior to the departure date. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about October 8, 1993, which denied defendant’s motion to reject the report of the Special Referee who found that the partnership agreement did not empower defendant to deprive plaintiff of his share of profits derived from his former law firm and directed an accounting, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[415]*415Giving a " 'fair and reasonable interpretation’ ” to the partnership agreement (Farrell Lines v City of New York, 30 NY2d 76, 83), the Referee properly found that the remaining partners improperly claimed equitable considerations to deny plaintiff any distribution for the months prior to the departure date. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 414, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-clifton-budd-demaria-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack