Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria

214 A.D.2d 414, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about October 8, 1993, which denied defendant’s motion to reject the report of the Special Referee who found that the partnership agreement did not empower defendant to deprive plaintiff of his share of profits derived from his former law firm and directed an accounting, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[415]*415Giving a " 'fair and reasonable interpretation’ ” to the partnership agreement (Farrell Lines v City of New York, 30 NY2d 76, 83), the Referee properly found that the remaining partners improperly claimed equitable considerations to deny plaintiff any distribution for the months prior to the departure date. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria, 214 A.D.2d 414, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

214 A.D.2d 414 (Burke v. Clifton, Budd & DeMaria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Brown & Jones
167 Misc. 2d 12 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)