Burke v. Carruthers

31 Cal. 467
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1866·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

By the Court, Currey, C. J.:

This is an action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer. The complaint, which was duly verified, set forth by proper allegations the plaintiff’s cause of action. The defendants answered separately. Upon the issue joined the parties proceeded to trial before the Court, and a finding and judgment were rendered in plaintiff’s favor. The appeal is from the judgment, and all that is presented by the record for review arises upon the judgment roll alone. Most of the material allegations of the complaint stand confessed, because the answers fail to controvert them. (Fish v. Redington, ante, 185.) The only matters upon which issue was joined were decided by the Court in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants, and we are unable to discover from the record any ground that would justify a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Carruthers, 31 Cal. 467 (Cal. 1866).

31 Cal. 467 (Burke v. Carruthers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tobola v. Wholet
170 P.2d 952 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Ramon v. Worsham
42 S.W.2d 1010 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1931)
Leete v. Pacific Mill & Mining Co.
89 F. 480 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1898)