Burke v. Burke

158 A.D. 953, 143 N.Y.S. 1108, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521

This text of 158 A.D. 953 (Burke v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burke v. Burke, 158 A.D. 953, 143 N.Y.S. 1108, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Order overruling demurrer and order continuing injunction affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to plead over within twenty days upon payment of the costs in this court and the court below. All concurred, except Robson and Lambert, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that this case does not present such exceptional features [954]*954as to justify the intervention of a court of equity under the rule laid down in Bomeisler v. Forster (154 N. Y. 229).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bomeisler v. . Forster
48 N.E. 534 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D. 953, 143 N.Y.S. 1108, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-burke-nyappdiv-1913.