BURKE, DOUGLAS v. BK PLUMBING, INC.

Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims·Decided August 5, 2026·No. 2026-30-1280·Published

Opinion

FILED Aug 05, 2026 02:45 PM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE

DOUGLAS BURKE, Docket No. 2026-30-1280 Employee, v. BK PLUMBING, INC., State File No. 860053-2026 Employer, and LUBA INDEMNITY INS. CO., Judge Pamela B. Johnson Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

Decision on the Record

Douglas Burke injured his back at work and asked for medical and temporary disability benefits. BK Plumbing denied that his injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment. For the reasons below, the Court grants in part Mr. Burke’s request for benefits.

Claim History

On January 28, 2026, Mr. Burke reported a low-back injury to BK Plumbing from lifting and carrying a 45-pound box of insulation. He asked for benefits, but none were offered. So, he visited an emergency room that day.

Although Mr. Burke injured his back previously, requiring surgery, he had not treated for that injury for more than one year before this work injury.

At the emergency room, he told staff that he injured his back from lifting at work and mentioned his previous injury and treatment. The nurse reported that “he ha[s] concrete in his low back and needs a lower back x-ray,” stating “he got hurt on the job lifting too much.” The evaluating physician noted:

The patient presents with back pain. The onset was chronic. The course/duration of symptoms is constant and improving. Type of injury: lifting. The location where the incident occurred was at work . . . Risk factors consist of compression fracture s/p Kyphoplasty. Prior episodes: occasional.

An x-ray showed evidence of treatment for his prior injury, an interval L4 kyphoplasty, and revealed advanced lower lumbar facet arthropathy. The physician diagnosed back pain and degenerative joint disease.

Since the work injury, Mr. Burke has back pain and numbness in his toes.

BK Plumbing argued Mr. Burke is not entitled to benefits because he has not shown through expert opinion that his employment was more than 50% responsible for his present condition. It asserted that he did not offer “an opinion regarding causation or evidence of an actual progression or aggravation of a prior disabling condition or disease” or evidence that his condition primarily arose from the alleged lifting incident.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Burke’s burden is not to prove a compensable injury by a preponderance of the evidence, but to prove that he is likely to prevail at a compensation hearing on the requested benefits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Here, Mr. Burke offered uncontradicted testimony that he injured his back while lifting and carrying a box at work. The same day, he reported the injury and sought medical treatment. The emergency room records indicated that Mr. Burke told staff he injured his back while lifting at work. Thus, the evidence shows that he suffered a work injury, reported it to BK Plumbing, and asked for medical care.

The evidence here supports awarding a panel of orthopedic physicians. An employer shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, “treatment . . . made reasonably necessary” by the work accident. Tenn. Code Ann. section 50-6- 204(a)(1)(A) (2025). To that end, subsection 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i) requires an employer to offer a panel of three doctors for the employee to choose one as a treating physician. Moreover, an employer must provide the panel “[f]ollowing receipt of notice of a workplace injury and the employee expressing a need for medical care.” Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-01-.06(1) (May 2018).

Aside from its own interpretation of the medical records, BK Plumbing presented no proof to support its contention that Mr. Burke failed to meet his burden. “The parties and their lawyers cannot rely on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their arguments, and they face significant risks if they choose to do so.” Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *31 (Jan. 30, 2018).

Therefore, the Court orders BK Plumbing to provide Mr. Burke a panel of orthopedic physicians from which he shall select a treating physician.

To recover temporary disability benefits, Mr. Burke must show: (1) he became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and his inability to work; and (3) the period of his disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

Mr. Burke did not introduce expert testimony that he was taken off work or restricted from work due to his injury or evidence of his average weekly wage or compensation rate. Thus, Mr. Burke did not prove that he is likely to prevail at the compensation hearing that he is entitled to temporary disability benefits.

Finally, section 50-6-118 requires the Bureau to collect penalties in certain circumstances, including the failure of an employer to timely provide a panel of physicians. Based on the Court’s findings, the Court refers BK Plumbing to the Bureau’s Compliance Program for investigation and assessment of a penalty for its failure to timely offer a panel of physicians.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. BK Plumbing shall provide a panel of orthopedic physicians and offer reasonable and necessary medical treatment related to the January 28, 2026 work injury.

2. Mr. Burke’s request for temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

3. BK Plumbing and its carrier are referred to the Compliance Program for investigation and assessment of a penalty for failure to timely offer a panel of physicians.

4. The parties must appear for a Status/Scheduling Hearing on December 17, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. The parties must dial 855-543-5041 to participate.

5. Unless appealed, compliance must occur within seven business days of entry of this order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 239(d)(3).

ENTERED August 5, 2026.

JUDGE PAMELA B. JOHNSON Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

The technical record consists of all documents filed on the TNComp electronic filing system, which the Court will consider in reaching its decision.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as shown on August 5, 2026.

Name Mail Email Service sent to: George Garrison, X georgegarrison@volsfirm.net Employee’s Attorney James H. Tucker, Jr. X jtucker@manierherod.com Employer’s Attorney Compliance Program X wccompliance.program@tn.gov

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

 If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.  If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURKE, DOUGLAS v. BK PLUMBING, INC., (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2026).

BURKE, DOUGLAS v. BK PLUMBING, INC. (BURKE, DOUGLAS v. BK PLUMBING, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239