Burkan v. Ex-Lax, Inc.

253 A.D. 754, 300 N.Y.S. 844, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 24, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D. 754 (Burkan v. Ex-Lax, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burkan v. Ex-Lax, Inc., 253 A.D. 754, 300 N.Y.S. 844, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and. the facts, without costs, and the motion for a peremptory mandamus granted, in the exercise of discretion, in so far as to direct the respondent corporation to furnish the applicant with a verified, detailed earnings statement for the last fiscal year, together with a financial statement showing the financial [755]*755condition of the company as of the date of the termination of such last fiscal year, and similar statements covering any quarter-annual or semi-annual periods elapsed since the date of the expiration of the previous fiscal year. Such statement is to be rendered within ten days from the entry of the order hereon; this without prejudice to applicant of Ms right, after receiving such statement, to renew his application, or to take such other action as he may be advised. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feinberg v. Enselberg
185 Misc. 358 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 754, 300 N.Y.S. 844, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkan-v-ex-lax-inc-nyappdiv-1937.