Burk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Burk v. State

134 S.W. 705, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 638

DecidedFebruary 15, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.W. 705 (Burk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burk v. State, 134 S.W. 705, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 638 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

DAYIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for robbery; the punishment being assessed at 15 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before hs without a statement of the facts or bills of exceptions. The only ground of the motion for new trial is based upon the statement that the verdict and judgment are contrary to law and the evidence. The record, as above stated, being before us without the facts adduced on the trial of the case, this alleged error cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAYIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for robbery; the punishment being assessed at 15 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before hs without a statement of the facts or bills of exceptions. The only ground of the motion for new trial is based upon the statement that the verdict and judgment are contrary to law and the evidence. The record, as above stated, being before us without the facts adduced on the trial of the case, this alleged error cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.W. 705, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burk-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.