Burk v. Phips

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Burk v. Phips

1 Root 487

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 15, 1793

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 Root 487 (Burk v. Phips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burk v. Phips, 1 Root 487 (Colo. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion in arrest adjudged sufficient — 1st. Therei is no averment in tbe declaration that tbe plaintiff is a feme sole, or but that said Edward’s father is living. 2d. It doth not appear that she was guardian or any way entitled to tbe services of said boy; that as mother she is not, which differs the case from that of a father’s commencing tbe action, for be is tbe natural guardian of bis minor children, and entitled to their services.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion in arrest adjudged sufficient — 1st. Therei is no averment in tbe declaration that tbe plaintiff is a feme sole, or but that said Edward’s father is living. 2d. It doth not appear that she was guardian or any way entitled to tbe services of said boy; that as mother she is not, which differs the case from that of a father’s commencing tbe action, for be is tbe natural guardian of bis minor children, and entitled to their services.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burk-v-phips-conn-1793.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack