Burk v. Burk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burk v. Burk

39 S.W.2d 454, 225 Mo. App. 746, 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103

DecidedMay 4, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 39 S.W.2d 454 (Burk v. Burk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burk v. Burk, 39 S.W.2d 454, 225 Mo. App. 746, 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103 (Mo. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinions

Action for divorce.

Upon trial in the court below, decree was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant appeals.

It appears from the abstract of the record furnished by defendant that motion for new trial has not been preserved in a bill of exceptions. There is therefore nothing before us for review, except the record proper, in which there is no claim of error. [Roden v. Helm, 192 Mo. 71, 81, 90 S.W. 798.]

The judgment is affirmed. Boyer, C., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for divorce.

Upon trial in the court below, decree was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant appeals.

It appears from the abstract of the record furnished by defendant that motion for new trial has not been preserved in a bill of exceptions. There is therefore nothing before us for review, except the record proper, in which there is no claim of error. [Roden v. Helm, 192 Mo. 71, 81, 90 S.W. 798.]

The judgment is affirmed. Boyer, C., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.W.2d 454, 225 Mo. App. 746, 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burk-v-burk-moctapp-1931.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack