Burk v. Burk
39 S.W.2d 454, 225 Mo. App. 746, 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103
Opinions
Action for divorce.
Upon trial in the court below, decree was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant appeals.
It appears from the abstract of the record furnished by defendant that motion for new trial has not been preserved in a bill of exceptions. There is therefore nothing before us for review, except the record proper, in which there is no claim of error. [Roden v. Helm,
The judgment is affirmed. Boyer, C., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burk v. Burk, 39 S.W.2d 454, 225 Mo. App. 746, 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103 (Mo. Ct. App. 1931).
39 S.W.2d 454 (Burk v. Burk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roden v. Helm
192 Mo. 71 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)