Burk v. Blum

426 N.E.2d 180, 54 N.Y.2d 665, 442 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2617
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1981·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services annulled.

It was impermissible for the commissioner to include petitioners’ self-supporting adult child as a member of the household for Medicaid eligibility purposes (Matter of [667]*667Vailes v D’Ella, 54 NY2cl 663 [decided herewith]). Indeed, even under the commissioner’s own “fictitious” ADC recipient rationale, which we have today rejected, the child could not be deemed a household member (Matter of Genin v Tola, 47 NY2d 959).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burk v. Blum, 426 N.E.2d 180, 54 N.Y.2d 665, 442 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2617 (N.Y. 1981).

426 N.E.2d 180 (Burk v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Genin v. Toia
393 N.E.2d 1026 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)