Burk v. Blum

New York Court of Appeals

Burk v. Blum

426 N.E.2d 180, 54 N.Y.2d 665, 442 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2617

DecidedJune 30, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 426 N.E.2d 180 (Burk v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burk v. Blum, 426 N.E.2d 180, 54 N.Y.2d 665, 442 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2617 (N.Y. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services annulled.

It was impermissible for the commissioner to include petitioners’ self-supporting adult child as a member of the household for Medicaid eligibility purposes (Matter of [667]*667Vailes v D’Ella, 54 NY2cl 663 [decided herewith]). Indeed, even under the commissioner’s own “fictitious” ADC recipient rationale, which we have today rejected, the child could not be deemed a household member (Matter of Genin v Tola, 47 NY2d 959).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI