Burien Nissan, Inc. v. Commissioner
This text of 75 F. App'x 652 (Burien Nissan, Inc. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
There was no clear error in the Tax Court’s factual findings that: (1) Burien Nissan acquired the covenant not to compete in conjunction with the December 1993 Agreement (thus after the effective date of I.R.C. § 197(a)); (2) the $45,483 payment to Johnston was compensation for the covenant and not for a promissory note; (3) the $290,000 payment was income to Johnston notwithstanding any assignment to Don Johnston, Inc.; and (4) the taxpayers failed to take due care to report their income.
Accordingly, we affirm the Tax Court’s decision upholding the deficiencies and penalties assessed by the Commissioner in all respects.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burien-nissan-inc-v-commissioner-ca9-2003.