Burhoop v. Burhoop

433 N.W.2d 166, 230 Neb. 594, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 444
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burhoop v. Burhoop. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 Neb. 657
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 1988·No. No. 87-228·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the first appearance of this dissolution of marriage action in this court, we, among other things, affirmed the alimony awarded the respondent-appellee wife, Jean M. Burhoop. Burhoop v. Burhoop, 221 Neb. 657, 380 N.W.2d 254 (1986). In the matter presently before us, the petitioner-appellant husband, Boyd E. Burhoop, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify or revoke the alimony payments previously awarded the wife.

We, as we are required, have reviewed the trial court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the husband’s application. Accordingly, the action of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burhoop v. Burhoop, 433 N.W.2d 166, 230 Neb. 594, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 444 (Neb. 1988).

433 N.W.2d 166 (Burhoop v. Burhoop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burhoop v. Burhoop
380 N.W.2d 254 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)