Burhoop v. Burhoop
This text of 433 N.W.2d 166 (Burhoop v. Burhoop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the first appearance of this dissolution of marriage action in this court, we, among other things, affirmed the alimony awarded the respondent-appellee wife, Jean M. Burhoop. Burhoop v. Burhoop, 221 Neb. 657, 380 N.W.2d 254 (1986). In the matter presently before us, the petitioner-appellant husband, Boyd E. Burhoop, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify or revoke the alimony payments previously awarded the wife.
We, as we are required, have reviewed the trial court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the husband’s application. Accordingly, the action of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 N.W.2d 166, 230 Neb. 594, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burhoop-v-burhoop-neb-1988.