Burgthal v. The George Skolfield

4 F. Cas. 729, 1849 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 31, 1849·Published

Opinion

This suit seeks the recovery of the value of a large bale of merchandise and portions of the contents of several boxes, all allowed to have been shipped in good order at Bremen. The defence, is that, the missing bale was never received on board the ship, and that the boxes, if rifled of their contents, were broken open before received by the ship, or after they left the ship and were placed in the public store. THE COURT held that the clear preponderance of proof was that the bale was laden on board the ship, and that the boxes were received there in good order, and held that the ship was responsible for the value of the bale. Held, also, that the ship was liable for the loss of goods in the public store, if sent there without previous notice to the consignees, where the consignees were known and resident of this port. But held that, on the evidence, there is a great doubt whether the bale, when laden at Bremen, contained the whole .of articles packed in at Vienna, and ordered a reference to a commissioner to ascertain the value of the articles missing from the boxes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgthal v. The George Skolfield, 4 F. Cas. 729, 1849 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33 (S.D.N.Y. 1849).

4 F. Cas. 729 (Burgthal v. The George Skolfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.