Burgreen Contracting Company, Inc. v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Burgreen Contracting Company, Inc. v. Goodman

314 So. 2d 296, 294 Ala. 199, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1172

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 29, 1975

DocketSC 1285

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 314 So. 2d 296 (Burgreen Contracting Company, Inc. v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgreen Contracting Company, Inc. v. Goodman, 314 So. 2d 296, 294 Ala. 199, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1172 (Ala. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

ALMON, Justice.

Petitioner, appellant below, filed an appeal with the Court of Civil Appeals seeking a reversal of a $3,500.00 judgment against it for damage done to two brood mares belonging to Jack Goodman, appellee below.

The cause was dismissed by the Court of Civil Appeals upon a motion to strike the transcript of the record interposed by appellee for want of timely filing.

Upon a motion for rehearing, the Court of Civil Appeals withdrew the original opinion and reached the merits of the cause affirming the trial court’s verdict against petitioner. Burgreen Contracting Co., Inc. v. Goodman, 55 Ala.App. 209, 314 So.2d 284 (1975).

A petition for certiorari is now before us to review and revise the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals. The writ must be denied.

Supreme Court Rule 39 provides in pertinent part:

“This court will not in term time, . consider an application for the writ of certiorari, . . . for the purpose of reviewing or revising any opinion or decision of the courts of appeals, [200]*200unless it appears upon the face of the application therefor that application has been made to the appropriate court of appeals for a rehearing of the point or decision complained of, and that said application had been decided adversely to the movant, . . . (Emphasis ours.)

On the rehearing below the only “point or decision complained of” considered a second time was the propriety of the original granting of appellee’s motion to strike the transcript of the record which was resolved in favor of petitioner. The “point or decision complained of” here, was considered only once by the Court of Civil Appeals. Neither the letter nor spirit of Rule 39 has been complied with. Moore v. State, 274 Ala. 276, 147 So.2d 835 (1962); American Liberty Insurance Co. v. Pack, 287 Ala. 13, 246 So.2d 668 (1971).

Such defect is jurisdictional. Oliver v. State, 256 Ala. 295, 54 So.2d 618 (1951). Accordingly, the petition for certiorari must be stricken.

Petition stricken.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALMON, Justice.

Petitioner, appellant below, filed an appeal with the Court of Civil Appeals seeking a reversal of a $3,500.00 judgment against it for damage done to two brood mares belonging to Jack Goodman, appellee below.

The cause was dismissed by the Court of Civil Appeals upon a motion to strike the transcript of the record interposed by appellee for want of timely filing.

Upon a motion for rehearing, the Court of Civil Appeals withdrew the original opinion and reached the merits of the cause affirming the trial court’s verdict against petitioner. Burgreen Contracting Co., Inc. v. Goodman, 55 Ala.App. 209, 314 So.2d 284 (1975).

A petition for certiorari is now before us to review and revise the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals. The writ must be denied.

Supreme Court Rule 39 provides in pertinent part:

“This court will not in term time, . consider an application for the writ of certiorari, . . . for the purpose of reviewing or revising any opinion or decision of the courts of appeals, [200]*200unless it appears upon the face of the application therefor that application has been made to the appropriate court of appeals for a rehearing of the point or decision complained of, and that said application had been decided adversely to the movant, . . . (Emphasis ours.)

On the rehearing below the only “point or decision complained of” considered a second time was the propriety of the original granting of appellee’s motion to strike the transcript of the record which was resolved in favor of petitioner. The “point or decision complained of” here, was considered only once by the Court of Civil Appeals. Neither the letter nor spirit of Rule 39 has been complied with. Moore v. State, 274 Ala. 276, 147 So.2d 835 (1962); American Liberty Insurance Co. v. Pack, 287 Ala. 13, 246 So.2d 668 (1971).

Such defect is jurisdictional. Oliver v. State, 256 Ala. 295, 54 So.2d 618 (1951). Accordingly, the petition for certiorari must be stricken.

Petition stricken.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 So. 2d 296, 294 Ala. 199, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgreen-contracting-company-inc-v-goodman-ala-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack