Burgoyne v. Eastern & Western Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Burgoyne v. Eastern & Western Railway Co.

13 N.Y.S. 537, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 384, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3232

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 24, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 537 (Burgoyne v. Eastern & Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgoyne v. Eastern & Western Railway Co., 13 N.Y.S. 537, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 384, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3232 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, J.

Section 1784 of the Code authorizes the appointment of a receiver in an action brought to sequestrate the property of a corporation created by or under the laws of this state. The defendant is a foreign corporation, and I have not been referred to any provision of the Code or of any other statute which authorizes the appointment of a receiver in this action.

The motion must therefore be denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, J.

Section 1784 of the Code authorizes the appointment of a receiver in an action brought to sequestrate the property of a corporation created by or under the laws of this state. The defendant is a foreign corporation, and I have not been referred to any provision of the Code or of any other statute which authorizes the appointment of a receiver in this action.

The motion must therefore be denied, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.Y.S. 537, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 384, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgoyne-v-eastern-western-railway-co-nysupct-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack