Burgos v. State

816 So. 2d 1252, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641, 2002 WL 1071945
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burgos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 765 So. 2d 967
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2002·No. No. 5D01-3074·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

Burgos was convicted of lewd and lascivious molestation of a child under twelve. Because the State failed to offer proof of Burgos’ age (thirty years old), the court entered a conviction as one for a person under eighteen. This was a second degree felony. The court then sentenced defendant as an habitual violent felony offender to thirty years in prison based on his prior Illinois conviction for “armed violence.”1 Appellant argues, the State concedes and we agree that the Illinois conviction is not analogous to a Florida qualifying offense under the Habitual Violent Felony Offender Act, and the sentence is reversed with [1253]*1253instructions to resentence Burgos to any lawful sentence.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgos v. State, 816 So. 2d 1252, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641, 2002 WL 1071945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

816 So. 2d 1252 (Burgos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.