Burgos v. Miller

1 A.D.2d 873, 767 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1 A.D.3d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 2003·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary [874] rule that prohibits possession of contraband. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Saunders v Goord, 289 AD2d 649 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgos v. Miller, 1 A.D.2d 873, 767 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1 A.D.3d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.2d 873 (Burgos v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raqiyb v. Goord
28 A.D.3d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Zaire v. West
27 A.D.3d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Carroll v. Goord
24 A.D.3d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dunavin v. Connell
20 A.D.3d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Diaz v. Goord
19 A.D.3d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)