Burgos v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burgos v. Miller

1 A.D.2d 873, 767 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1 A.D.3d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 873 (Burgos v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgos v. Miller, 1 A.D.2d 873, 767 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1 A.D.3d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary [874]*874rule that prohibits possession of contraband. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Saunders v Goord, 289 AD2d 649 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary [874]*874rule that prohibits possession of contraband. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Saunders v Goord, 289 AD2d 649 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 873, 767 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1 A.D.3d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgos-v-miller-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack