Burgos v. J. Santini Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burgos v. J. Santini Bros.

20 A.D.2d 521, 244 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 521 (Burgos v. J. Santini Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgos v. J. Santini Bros., 20 A.D.2d 521, 244 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, entered February 15, 1963, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $19,195.10, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the verdict vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $7,500 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendants-appellants. In this personal injury action the jury’s verdict is grossly excessive in its award of damages and a verdict in excess of $7,500 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, entered February 15, 1963, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $19,195.10, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the verdict vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $7,500 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendants-appellants. In this personal injury action the jury’s verdict is grossly excessive in its award of damages and a verdict in excess of $7,500 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 521, 244 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgos-v-j-santini-bros-nyappdiv-1963.