Burgos v. City of New Rochelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burgos v. City of New Rochelle

138 A.D.2d 556, 526 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3140

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1988·Published

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 6, 1987, as, upon reargument and renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated January 2, 1987, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Ruskin in the Supreme Court, Westchester County. Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 6, 1987, as, upon reargument and renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated January 2, 1987, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Ruskin in the Supreme Court, Westchester County. Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Burgos v. City of New Rochelle, 138 A.D.2d 556, 526 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

138 A.D.2d 556 (Burgos v. City of New Rochelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.