Burgos v. Areway, Inc.
This text of 1997 Ohio 172 (Burgos v. Areway, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 1207.]
BURGOS, APPELLANT, v. AREWAY, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Burgos v. Areway, Inc., 1997-Ohio-172.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-1447—Submitted May 21, 1997—Decided July 9, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 69447. ___________________ Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A., Thomas Mester, Joel Levin, John P. Schloss and Sandra J. Rosenthal, for appellant. Papandreas, Fahrer & Corso, John G. Papandreas and Aimee E. Gilman; Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff P.L.L., David W. Mellott and Mark A. Phillips, for appellee. ___________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. ___________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the decision of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. ___________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Ohio 172, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgos-v-areway-inc-ohio-1997.