Burgos v. Alamo Financing LLP
This text of 44 A.D.3d 555 (Burgos v. Alamo Financing LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered March 12, 2007, which denied the motion by defendants Alamo and Rivera for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The proof on defendants’ motion consisted mainly of deposition transcripts of the passengers and the adverse codefendant driver, but did not sufficiently demonstrate who was liable for the accident (see e.g. Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.D.3d 555, 843 N.Y.S.2d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgos-v-alamo-financing-llp-nyappdiv-2007.