Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Burgoon v. Com. Mut. Ins.

Burgoon v. Com. Mut. Ins.

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 172
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 8, 1927
DocketNo. 20312
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 172 (Burgoon v. Com. Mut. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgoon v. Com. Mut. Ins., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 172 (Ohio 1927).

Opinion

Burgoon contends in the Supreme Court that when depositions are taken by both plaintiff and defendant’s agent, and defendant does not file his deposition until day of hearing; Burgoon;” after reading his,, has the right to be sustained in an objection to reading of cross examination of the agent as shown by Insurance Company’s deposition.

Note — Motion to certify overruled, 5 Abs. 155.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgoon-v-com-mut-ins-ohio-1927.