Burgiss v. Smith

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 67
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedAugust 6, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 67 (Burgiss v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgiss v. Smith, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 67 (N.Y. 1847).

Opinion

Appeal from an.order of the late vice chancellor of the first circuit denying an application to dissolve an injunction. Decided that this court has jurisdiction, and will entertain a bill of discovery in aid of the prosecution of a civil suit in a sister state, or a foreign tribunal, or in a court of the United States.-

Injunctions to stay proceed’gs in suits in other states.

Held also, that if this court has the power, it must he a verv . r ’ J special case to induce.it to break over the rule of comity and of policy which forbids the granting of an injunction to stay the proceedings in a suit which has already been commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction in a sister state.

Order appealed from reversed; and injunction dissolved with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgiss-v-smith-nychanct-1847.