Burgio v. Frank Mercede & Sons of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burgio v. Frank Mercede & Sons of Florida

372 So. 2d 207, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15334

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1979

DocketNo. 78-1967

StatusPublished

This text of 372 So. 2d 207 (Burgio v. Frank Mercede & Sons of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgio v. Frank Mercede & Sons of Florida, 372 So. 2d 207, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s points on appeal are in substance whether the trial court erred (1) in failing to award attorney’s fees in connection with successful enforcement of workmen’s compensation order; (2) in failing to award interest from date of final workmen’s compensation order to date of final judgment; and (3) in failing to award costs incurred in successful proceedings enforcing payment pursuant to final workmen’s compensation order.

We have considered all the points on appeal in the light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that the trial court erred in denying the award of attorney’s fees, costs and interest from the date of the final order to date of final judgment. Stone v. Jeffres, 208 So.2d 827 (Fla.1968).

Reversed and remanded for entry of proper award of attorney’s fees, interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s points on appeal are in substance whether the trial court erred (1) in failing to award attorney’s fees in connection with successful enforcement of workmen’s compensation order; (2) in failing to award interest from date of final workmen’s compensation order to date of final judgment; and (3) in failing to award costs incurred in successful proceedings enforcing payment pursuant to final workmen’s compensation order.

We have considered all the points on appeal in the light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that the trial court erred in denying the award of attorney’s fees, costs and interest from the date of the final order to date of final judgment. Stone v. Jeffres, 208 So.2d 827 (Fla.1968).

Reversed and remanded for entry of proper award of attorney’s fees, interest and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 So. 2d 207, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgio-v-frank-mercede-sons-of-florida-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack