Burgio v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 4, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2393
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedApril 21, 1926
DocketDocket No. 4232.
StatusPublished

This text of 4 B.T.A. 4 (Burgio v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgio v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 4, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2393 (bta 1926).

Opinion

FINDINGS OE FACT.

The taxpayer is a resident of the City of New York. He was, during the year 1923, in the employ of A. Y. Victorius & Co., a corporation with its principal place of business at 370 Broadway, New York City. During a portion of such year he traveled as a salesman for this company, and, while so traveling, his expenses were advanced to him by his employer and by the employer charged to his account. The taxpayer was not in any way reimbursed for the amounts so expended. The advances made by the employer to the taxpayer monthly were as follows:

[[Image here]]
June_ 253
September-¡_ 219
Sept. 27 to Oet. 5- 66
Total_ 785

The taxpayer paid during the year necessary traveling expenses in the sum of $785.

Order of no deficiency will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Burgio
4 B.T.A. 4 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 4, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgio-v-commissioner-bta-1926.