Burgio v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 4, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2393
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided April 21, 1926·No. Docket No. 4232.·Published

Opinion

FINDINGS OE FACT.

The taxpayer is a resident of the City of New York. He was, during the year 1923, in the employ of A. Y. Victorius & Co., a corporation with its principal place of business at 370 Broadway, New York City. During a portion of such year he traveled as a salesman for this company, and, while so traveling, his expenses were advanced to him by his employer and by the employer charged to his account. The taxpayer was not in any way reimbursed for the amounts so expended. The advances made by the employer to the taxpayer monthly were as follows:

[[Image here]]
June_ 253
September-¡_ 219
Sept. 27 to Oet. 5- 66
Total_ 785

The taxpayer paid during the year necessary traveling expenses in the sum of $785.

Order of no deficiency will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgio v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 4, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2393 (bta 1926).

4 B.T.A. 4 (Burgio v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal of Burgio
4 B.T.A. 4 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)