Burginhofen v. Martin

3 Yeates 479
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per cur.

Then the fact must necessarily be ascertained by affidavits, to be laid before us.

Shippen, C. J.

added. It is justly taken for granted by the counsel in this court, that we possess the power of examining the proceedings of justices of the peace, in cases where the demand is under 40s., though the law does not give the party an appeal to the Court of Common Pleas. This point was solemnly determined by Kinzey, Chief Just, .many years ago, on a suit brought by Samuel Hasell, treasurer of the city corporation, on a bye law for measuring grain. The jurisdiction of superior courts, is only abridged by the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burginhofen v. Martin, 3 Yeates 479 (Pa. 1803).

3 Yeates 479 (Burginhofen v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicoll v. McCaffrey
1 Pa. Super. 187 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Peet v. City of Pittsburgh
96 Pa. 218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1880)
Sauser v. Werntz
1 Foster 249 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1873)
Chase v. Miller
41 Pa. 403 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1862)
Supervisors of Crawford County v. Le Clerc
3 Pin. 325 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1851)
Beaubien v. Brinckerhoff
3 Ill. 269 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1840)
Cullen v. Lowery
2 Del. 292 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1837)
Kline v. Wood
9 Serg. & Rawle 294 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1823)