BURGIE v. Lileikis

704 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 881
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 2005·No. 128120·Published

Opinion

704 N.W.2d 465 (2005)
474 Mich. 880-82

BURGIE v. LILEIKIS

No. 128120.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 13, 2005.

Application for leave to appeal.

SC: 128120, COA: 250666.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal because she believes the Court of Appeals misconstrued Robinson v. Detroit, 462 Mich. 439, 613 N.W.2d 307 (2000), and failed to properly view the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as is required in summary disposition motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURGIE v. Lileikis, 704 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 881 (Mich. 2005).

704 N.W.2d 465 (BURGIE v. Lileikis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. City of Detroit
613 N.W.2d 307 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)