BURGIE v. Lileikis

704 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 881
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 13, 2005
Docket128120
StatusPublished

This text of 704 N.W.2d 465 (BURGIE v. Lileikis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BURGIE v. Lileikis, 704 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 881 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

704 N.W.2d 465 (2005)
474 Mich. 880-82

BURGIE v. LILEIKIS

No. 128120.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 13, 2005.

Application for leave to appeal.

SC: 128120, COA: 250666.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal because she believes the Court of Appeals misconstrued Robinson v. Detroit, 462 Mich. 439, 613 N.W.2d 307 (2000), and failed to properly view the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as is required in summary disposition motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. City of Detroit
613 N.W.2d 307 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgie-v-lileikis-mich-2005.