Burgett v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

710 F. App'x 271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2018
DocketNo. 16-4105
StatusPublished

This text of 710 F. App'x 271 (Burgett v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgett v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, 710 F. App'x 271 (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles L. Burgett appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment, following remand, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from an incident on a Kansas City Area Transportation Authority bus. Upon careful consideration of Bur-gett’s arguments for reversal, and de novo review of the record, see Murchison v. Rogers, 779 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir. 2015) (viewing evidence in light most favorable to nonmovant, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor), we agree with the district court that the remaining defendants satisfied their burden of demonstrating that there were no genuine issues of material fact for trial on Burgett’s Fourth Amendment and related conspiracy claims, or on his 42 U.S.C. § 2000d claim, against them. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Murchison v. John Rogers
779 F.3d 882 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 F. App'x 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgett-v-kansas-city-board-of-police-commissioners-ca8-2018.