Burgest v. Wiley

107 F. App'x 362

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lamar E. Burgest, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burgest v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2004). We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED