Burgest v. Wiley
This text of 107 F. App'x 362 (Burgest v. Wiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lamar E. Burgest, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burgest v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2004). We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten *363 tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 F. App'x 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgest-v-wiley-ca4-2004.