Burgess v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2010·No. 106093·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6093

ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00451-GCM)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Charles Burgess, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Burgess appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C § 2241 (2006) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Burgess v. United States, No. 1:09-cv-00451-GCM

(W.D.N.C. filed Jan. 6 & Jan. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. United States, (4th Cir. 2010).

Burgess v. United States (Burgess v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 2241
28 U.S.C. § 2241