Burgess v. Towns of Grafton & Chester

10 Vt. 321
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedFebruary 15, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Vt. 321 (Burgess v. Towns of Grafton & Chester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgess v. Towns of Grafton & Chester, 10 Vt. 321 (Vt. 1838).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The testimony, to be used on the hearing of the report of a road committee, should be in the form of depositions; and, if drawn up in the hand.-writing of the adverse party, their agent, or .attorney, it cannot b.e admit-, fed.

Regularly, notice of the taking of depositions by the towns, in such cases, should be served on the first petitioner.

The testimony, in such cases, must be reduced to writing, unless it become nec.essary to verify a map .or plan of the survey of the road, and of other roads in the vicinity, in which case yyitnes^es may be examined, viva vpce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. Green
33 Vt. 565 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1861)
Wing v. Bates
16 Vt. 148 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Vt. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-towns-of-grafton-chester-vt-1838.