Burgess v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burgess v. State

380 S.W.3d 611, 2012 WL 4078913, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2012·No. No. ED 97594·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Clarence Burgess, appeals the motion court’s order dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order dismissing the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Clarence Burgess, appeals the motion court’s order dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order dismissing the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Burgess v. State, 380 S.W.3d 611, 2012 WL 4078913, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

380 S.W.3d 611 (Burgess v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.