Burgess v. State
This text of 222 So. 3d 555 (Burgess v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief and remand for resentencing pursuant to Atwell v. State, 197 So.3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). Appellant is entitled to be resentenced pursuant to the sentencing provisions enacted in chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida. See Atwell, 197 So.3d at 1050; see also Michel v. State, No. 4D13-1123, 204 So.3d 101, 2016 WL 6626028, at *1 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 9, 2016) (certifying conflict with Stallings v. State, 198 So.3d 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), and Williams v. State, 198 So.3d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 So. 3d 555, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 55, 2017 WL 34569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.