Burgess v. State

125 So. 3d 352, 2013 WL 5950838, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17859
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burgess v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2013·No. No. 5D12-3993·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an issue he appealed in Case No. 5D12-3379 in which we entered a Spence')-1 order on December 12, 2012, prohibiting Appellant “from filing any further pro se pleadings concerning St. Johns County Seventh Judicial Circuit Case No. CF01-488.” As this appeal raises the same issue addressed multiple times [353]*353in prior cases, we affirm and reiterate the prohibition. The Clerk of this court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning this case. Any further pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (noting “[ejnough is enough”).

AFFIRMED with instructions.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and WALLIS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. State, 125 So. 3d 352, 2013 WL 5950838, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17859 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

125 So. 3d 352 (Burgess v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)