Burgess v. State

790 So. 2d 547, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9810, 2001 WL 803468
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burgess v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 766 So. 2d 293
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2001·No. No. 4D01-2444·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Roderick D. Burgess, has raised in his June 18, 2001, application for writ of habeas corpus the same claims previously raised and rejected by this court in closed case numbers 4D01-1219 and 4D00-4024. This latest application is procedurally barred and constitutes an abuse of the judicial system. It is therefore denied. We hereby prohibit petitioner from filing any pro se petition or appeal in this court which raises the same issues raised herein. If petitioner violates this prohibition, he will face sanctions. See Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346, 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 732 So.2d 328 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. State, 790 So. 2d 547, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9810, 2001 WL 803468 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

790 So. 2d 547 (Burgess v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prince v. State
719 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)