Burgess v. Simpson
224 N.C. 102
Opinion
This case turns on the question as to whether the plaintiff, Bessie Pitt Burgess, acquired a fee simple title, or is able to convey such a title to the land devised to her by the will of her late husband, B. G. Burgess, quoted above. His Honor correctly held that the plaintiff did acquire and could convey a fee simple title to the land involved. This case is governed by the principles of law enunciated in Lineberger v. Phillips, 198 N. C., 661, 153 S. E., 118, and upon its authority the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burgess v. Simpson, 224 N.C. 102 (N.C. 1944).
224 N.C. 102 (Burgess v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quickel v. Quickel
136 S.E.2d 52 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Basnight v. Dill
124 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)