Burgess v. Sherman
23 A. 554, 147 Pa. 254, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 825
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 25, 1892
DocketAppeal, No. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 23 A. 554 (Burgess v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burgess v. Sherman, 23 A. 554, 147 Pa. 254, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 825 (Pa. 1892).
Opinion
- — -We cannot sustain any of the specifications of error. It is very clear that no verdict could have been rendered against defendants Dundore, Delaplaine and Eckert, and this being an action on a contract the verdict must necessarily be against all the defendants or none.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stanley v. Kijakazi
N.D. California, 2022
Dunlap Printing Co. v. Ryan
119 A. 714 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Browning
19 Pa. Super. 355 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 A. 554, 147 Pa. 254, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-sherman-pa-1892.