Burgess v. Sherman
23 A. 554, 147 Pa. 254, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 825
Opinion
- — -We cannot sustain any of the specifications of error. It is very clear that no verdict could have been rendered against defendants Dundore, Delaplaine and Eckert, and this being an action on a contract the verdict must necessarily be against all the defendants or none.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burgess v. Sherman, 23 A. 554, 147 Pa. 254, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 825 (Pa. 1892).
23 A. 554 (Burgess v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stanley v. Kijakazi
N.D. California, 2022
Dunlap Printing Co. v. Ryan
119 A. 714 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Browning
19 Pa. Super. 355 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)