Burgess v. Sabol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burgess v. Sabol

218 A.D.2d 736, 630 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8798

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 21, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of determinations of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated July 14, 1992, August 3, 1992, and November 9, 1992, made after hearings, as found that the petitioners lack standing to seek administrative review of the adequacy of foster care payments that were made on behalf of children who no longer reside with them, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated September 28, 1993, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the petitioners, as the providers of foster care rather than the recipients thereof, do not have standing to seek administrative review of the adequacy of foster care payments that were made on behalf of children who no longer reside with them (see, Matter of To-bias v Bane, 218 AD2d 743 [decided herewith]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of determinations of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated July 14, 1992, August 3, 1992, and November 9, 1992, made after hearings, as found that the petitioners lack standing to seek administrative review of the adequacy of foster care payments that were made on behalf of children who no longer reside with them, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated September 28, 1993, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the petitioners, as the providers of foster care rather than the recipients thereof, do not have standing to seek administrative review of the adequacy of foster care payments that were made on behalf of children who no longer reside with them (see, Matter of To-bias v Bane, 218 AD2d 743 [decided herewith]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Burgess v. Sabol, 218 A.D.2d 736, 630 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

218 A.D.2d 736 (Burgess v. Sabol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related