Burgess v. Nash

Supreme Court of Vermont

Burgess v. Nash

66 Vt. 44

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 Vt. 44 (Burgess v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgess v. Nash, 66 Vt. 44 (Vt. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The only question presented in this case is whether the defendant can make the defence of par[46]*46tial failure of consideration, under the provisions of R. L., s. 911. As held in Hoyt v. McNally, 66 Vt. 38, heard and decided this terra, the plaintiff is not an original party to the note in suit within the meaning of the statute, and, therefore, this defence cannot be interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

The only question presented in this case is whether the defendant can make the defence of par[46]*46tial failure of consideration, under the provisions of R. L., s. 911. As held in Hoyt v. McNally, 66 Vt. 38, heard and decided this terra, the plaintiff is not an original party to the note in suit within the meaning of the statute, and, therefore, this defence cannot be interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 Vt. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-nash-vt-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack