Burgess v. Nash

Supreme Court of Vermont

Burgess v. Nash

66 Vt. 44

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1893·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The only question presented in this case is whether the defendant can make the defence of par[46]*46tial failure of consideration, under the provisions of R. L., s. 911. As held in Hoyt v. McNally, 66 Vt. 38, heard and decided this terra, the plaintiff is not an original party to the note in suit within the meaning of the statute, and, therefore, this defence cannot be interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

The only question presented in this case is whether the defendant can make the defence of par[46]*46tial failure of consideration, under the provisions of R. L., s. 911. As held in Hoyt v. McNally, 66 Vt. 38, heard and decided this terra, the plaintiff is not an original party to the note in suit within the meaning of the statute, and, therefore, this defence cannot be interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Burgess v. Nash, 66 Vt. 44 (Vt. 1893).

Pincite

66 Vt. 44 (Burgess v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related