Burgess v. McNinch

139 S.E. 743, 104 W. Va. 251, 1927 W. Va. LEXIS 187
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 4, 1927
DocketC.C. 403
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 743 (Burgess v. McNinch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgess v. McNinch, 139 S.E. 743, 104 W. Va. 251, 1927 W. Va. LEXIS 187 (W. Va. 1927).

Opinion

Litz, Judge:

The Town of Glendale, in Marshall County, is a municipal corporation chartered by the circuit court under Chapter 47 of the Code. The Glendale Improvement Company; owner of the land from which the town was originally formed, reserved a strip one foot wide separating the lots and streets as then laid out from the lands south of said strip.

The order and certificate of incorporation, dated the 7th day of February, 1924, provide that the corporation shall not collect any taxes or assessments on property south of the one foot strip until the municipality shall have acquired the strip fi-om the Glendale Improvement Company.

The bill prays for an injunction restraining (a) the defendant F. A. MeNinch as Sheriff of Marshall County from selling the lands of the plaintiffs situated within the corporate limits of said town, and south of the one foot strip, for municipal taxes levied thereon in the year 1924; and (b) the defendant Town of Glendale from assessing or collecting any taxes upon said lands. The grounds for relief are (1) that the Town of Glendale has not been legally chartered; (2) that if it has been legally chartered, the lands of the plaintiffs *253 are by the terms of the charter exempt from taxation until such time as the town shall have obtained from Glendale Improvement Company the strip of land theretofore reserved by it; (3) that'the Town not having been incorporated until after January 1, 1924, could not assess taxes for that year; and (4) that a delinquent list of the taxes in question was not returned and recorded in the office of the clerk of the county court as required by law.

The validity of the charter is attacked on the ground that the circuit court improperly sustained a demurrer to the petition of certain remonstrants, including the plaintiffs in this ease, protesting against the incorporation. The certificate of incorporation, having been granted by the court in the exercise of proper jurisdiction, cannot be attacked collaterally. Even in a direct proceeding by writ of error findings and orders of' the circuit court in such cases are not subject to review by this court, unless plainly arbitrary or capricious. West v. West Virginia Fair Assn., 97 W. Va. 10.

The charter provision exempting the property of the plaintiffs from taxation is void as being in excess of the jurisdiction of the circuit court to grant certificates of incorporation, but does not affect the validity of the charter. “It is elementary law that an invalid part of a charter or statute does not invalidate the whole act.” 1 McQuillin .Municipal Corporations, 765.

The third point of error is also without merit. The taxes in controversy were levied for governmental expenses of the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1924. The taxes being a valid lien upon the lands of the plaintiffs, which may be enforced in equity as well as by ordinary tax sale through the Sheriff, the discharge of the same is a proper condition to relief in equity for irregularities in the return of delinquency.

A bill for an injunction to stay the collection of taxes must tender or offer to pay such taxes as are conceded to be due, or as the court can’ see ought to be paid, as a condition precedent to the granting of such relief. Blue Jacket &c. Co. v. Scherr, 50 W. Va. 533, 40 S. E. 514; Morenci &c. Co. v. Greer, 127 Fed. 199; Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 575; City v. Coch *254 rane, (Ga.) 128 S. E. 194; Nat’l. Bank v. Kimball, 103 U. S. 732.

The order of the circuit court overruling the demurrer to the bill is reversed, and the demurrer sustained.

Decree reversed; demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Secor
92 U.S. 575 (Supreme Court, 1876)
National Bank v. Kimball
103 U.S. 732 (Supreme Court, 1881)
West v. West Virginia Fair Ass'n
125 S.E. 353 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1924)
City of Camilla v. Cochran
128 S.E. 194 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Blue Jacket Consolidated Copper Co. v. Scherr
40 S.E. 514 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1901)
Morenci Copper Co. v. Freer
127 F. 199 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 743, 104 W. Va. 251, 1927 W. Va. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-mcninch-wva-1927.