Burgess v. McGinnis

297 A.D.2d 871, 746 N.Y.2d 922, 746 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8438
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 19, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 871 (Burgess v. McGinnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgess v. McGinnis, 297 A.D.2d 871, 746 N.Y.2d 922, 746 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating facility correspondence regulations. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination [872]*872has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. West
20 A.D.3d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Robertson v. Goord
10 A.D.3d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 871, 746 N.Y.2d 922, 746 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-mcginnis-nyappdiv-2002.