Burgess v. McGinnis
This text of 288 A.D.2d 734 (Burgess v. McGinnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from making false statements. The evidence presented at petitioner’s disciplinary hearing included the misbehavior report which related that petitioner had written a letter of complaint to respondent Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, reporting that an inmate in a neighboring cell was cooking food. When the reporting correction officer investigated petitioner’s complaint by searching the inmate’s cell, he found no evidence of cooking or burning of any kind to support it, causing him to conclude that petitioner had fabricated the allegation so he could move to a different cell.
Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented in the form of the detailed misbehavior report (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Lawrence v Edwards, 261 AD2d 404). Although petitioner contends that the charge is unfounded, this assertion raises an issue of credibility which was resolved against petitioner in the discretion of the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 617; Matter of Pabon v Goord, 275 AD2d 824). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 A.D.2d 734, 732 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-mcginnis-nyappdiv-2001.