Burgess v. Leon's Auto Collision, Inc.

91 Misc. 2d 128, 397 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2253
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 29, 1977·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Judgment and order (see 87 Misc 2d 351) affirmed, without costs.

The lower court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff and its denial of defendant’s motion were proper under the circum[129]*129stances herein. We do not pass upon the admissibility of the "Authorization to Repair” since the court below specifically found that, even if the document was admitted into evidence, it would still have determined that plaintiff did not sign the "Authorization to Repair”. Accordingly, any issue as to the document’s admissibility is academic.

Concur: Rinaldi, P. J., Weinstein and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. Leon's Auto Collision, Inc., 91 Misc. 2d 128, 397 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

91 Misc. 2d 128 (Burgess v. Leon's Auto Collision, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medical Expertise, P.C. v. Trumbull Insurance
196 Misc. 2d 389 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2003)
People v. Young
112 A.D.2d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Standard Textile Co. v. National Equipment Rental, Ltd.
80 A.D.2d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)