Burgess v. Leon's Auto Collision, Inc.
This text of 91 Misc. 2d 128 (Burgess v. Leon's Auto Collision, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. Judgment and order (see 87 Misc 2d 351) affirmed, without costs.
The lower court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff and its denial of defendant’s motion were proper under the circum[129]*129stances herein. We do not pass upon the admissibility of the "Authorization to Repair” since the court below specifically found that, even if the document was admitted into evidence, it would still have determined that plaintiff did not sign the "Authorization to Repair”. Accordingly, any issue as to the document’s admissibility is academic.
Concur: Rinaldi, P. J., Weinstein and Thompson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 Misc. 2d 128, 397 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-leons-auto-collision-inc-nyappterm-1977.